Considering the Praises and Criticisms of The Catcher in the Rye :: Catcher Rye Essays

Considering the Praises and Criticisms of The backstop in the Rye Since its publication in 1951, J.D. Salingers The backstop in the Rye has served as a firestorm for controversy and debate. Critics have argued the moral issues raised by the book and the context in which it is presented. Some have argued that Salingers tale of the human condition is fascinate and enlightening, besides incredibly depressing. The psychological battles of the novels main character, Holden Caulfield, serve as the basis for critical argument. Caulfields self-destruction over a period of days forces one to job societys place toward the human condition. Salingers portrayal of Holden, which includes incidents of depression, nervous breakdown, impulsive spending, sexual exploration, vulgarity, and other erratic behavior, have all attributed to the controversial nature of the novel. Yet the novel is not without its precipitous advocates, who argue that it is a critical look at the problems facing American youth during the 1950s. When developing a comprehensive opinion of the novel, it is important to press the praises and criticisms of The Catcher in the Rye. When studying a piece of literature, it is meaningful to note the historical background of the piece and the time at which it was pen. Two J.D. Salinger short stories, Im frantic and elegant Rebellion off Madison, were published in periodicals during the 1940s, and introduced Holden Caulfield, the main character of The Catcher in the Rye. Both short stories were revised for later inclusion in Salingers novel. The Catcher in the Rye was written in a literary style similar to prose, which was enhanced by the teenage slang of the 1950s. It is a widespread thought that much of Holden Caulfields candid outlook on life reflects issues relevant to the youth of today, and thus the novel continues to be used as an educational resourcefulness in high schools throughout the nation (Davis 317-18). The first step in reviewing critici sm of The Catcher in the Rye is to study the author himself. Before his novel, J.D. Salinger was of basal non-literary status, having written for years without notice from critics or the general public. The Catcher in the Rye was his first step onto the literary playing field. This initial status left over(p) Salinger, as a serious writer, almost unique as a sort of free agent, not bound to one or more schools of critics, identical umteen of his contemporaries were.Considering the Praises and Criticisms of The Catcher in the Rye Catcher Rye EssaysConsidering the Praises and Criticisms of The Catcher in the Rye Since its publication in 1951, J.D. Salingers The Catcher in the Rye has served as a firestorm for controversy and debate. Critics have argued the moral issues raised by the book and the context in which it is presented. Some have argued that Salingers tale of the human condition is fascinating and enlightening, yet incredibly depressing. The psychological battles of t he novels main character, Holden Caulfield, serve as the basis for critical argument. Caulfields self-destruction over a period of days forces one to contemplate societys attitude toward the human condition. Salingers portrayal of Holden, which includes incidents of depression, nervous breakdown, impulsive spending, sexual exploration, vulgarity, and other erratic behavior, have all attributed to the controversial nature of the novel. Yet the novel is not without its sharp advocates, who argue that it is a critical look at the problems facing American youth during the 1950s. When developing a comprehensive opinion of the novel, it is important to consider the praises and criticisms of The Catcher in the Rye. When studying a piece of literature, it is meaningful to note the historical background of the piece and the time at which it was written. Two J.D. Salinger short stories, Im Crazy and Slight Rebellion off Madison, were published in periodicals during the 1940s, and introduced H olden Caulfield, the main character of The Catcher in the Rye. Both short stories were revised for later inclusion in Salingers novel. The Catcher in the Rye was written in a literary style similar to prose, which was enhanced by the teenage slang of the 1950s. It is a widespread belief that much of Holden Caulfields candid outlook on life reflects issues relevant to the youth of today, and thus the novel continues to be used as an educational resource in high schools throughout the nation (Davis 317-18). The first step in reviewing criticism of The Catcher in the Rye is to study the author himself. Before his novel, J.D. Salinger was of basic non-literary status, having written for years without notice from critics or the general public. The Catcher in the Rye was his first step onto the literary playing field. This initial status left Salinger, as a serious writer, almost unique as a sort of free agent, not bound to one or more schools of critics, like many of his contemporaries w ere.

prime minister :: essays research papers

"I would anticipate that the major combat engagements are over," Maj. Gen. Stanley McChrystal told reporters at a Pentagon briefing. He said U.S. forces are woful into a phase of "smaller, albeit sharper fights." McChrystal said the number of daily air missions had dropped to 700 or 800 in recent days, down from about 1,000 or more a day. And Monday, he said, marked the last day that aircraft from all five aircraft carriers would fly missions over Iraq. Plans were announced to scale back the American naval presence in the Persian gulf by bringing home cardinal carrier groups in the coming days. The USS Kitty Hawk and USS Constellation could leave the Persian Gulf in the next several days, officials said. That would leave the USS Nimitz, which recently replaced the USS Abraham Lincoln, as the only remaining carrier group in the gulf. Officials also said one of the two groups in the Red Sea, the USS Harry S. Truman or the USS Theodore Roosevelt, could depart soon. C oalition fighting Monday against Iraqi targets in Tikrit, Saddam Husseins hometown, was not as fierce as most expected. McChrystal said the Iraqi forces there lacked a "coherent defense." Still, he cautioned against any suggestion that danger had passed for coalition forces. Meanwhile, U.S. troops believe they view as constitute 11 mobile chemical and biological laboratories buried south of Baghdad outside Karbala, a U.S. general said Monday. (Full story) No chemical or biological weapons were found along with the labs, but soldiers recovered "about 1,000 pounds" of documents inside them, said Brig. Gen. Benjamin Freakley of the Armys 101st Airborne Division. U.N. weapons inspectors in February "found nothing untoward" at an ammunition filling plant close to where the United States says troops have found the labs, a U.N. inspection team spokesman said Monday. In February, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell told the U.N. protection Council that Iraq had mobile biological weapons labs on at least 18 flatbed trucks. Disarming Iraq of its alleged weapons of mass destruction had been among the coalitions foremost goals entering the war, officials said. To date, there have been no confirmed discoveries of any such weaponry. The "only significant combat action" Monday took place in Tikrit, the lone major Iraqi holdout, said Brig. Gen. Vincent countenance of U.S. Central Command. After heavy airstrikes and sporadic battles Sunday, coalition forces from the south, west and north moved early Monday into the center of the north-central Iraqi city, the hometown of the deposed Iraqi president.

Postmodernism and Social Praxis Essay -- Ethics Feminism Theology Essa

Postmodernism and Social PraxisWhereas the interpreter is obliged to go to the depth of things, like an excavator, the moment of interpretation genealogy is like an overview, from higher and higher up, which allows the depth to be laid out in front of him in a more and more profound visibility depth is resituated as an absolutely superficial secret.(18)So those are the changes, and I try to show those changes...(19)In Communities of Resistance and Solidarity, as well as in A Feminist Ethic of Risk, Sharon D. Welch sets forth a liberation theology in which the deconstructive processes of Michel Foucault are key. Her theology is an amalgam of Foucaults poststructuralist concepts and liberation theologys action-oriented motivation. Welch claims the genealogical methods of Foucault are ideal motivators, urging the activist to political involvement. However, Michel Foucaults genealogy was not intended for such pragmatic applications. Foucaults purpose in writing genealogies was neer acti on-oriented. He only set out to show those changes. By definition, genealogy never rests in one discourse or on one truth. Foucault, as an interpreter, emphasizes the necessary tension between keeping distance from historical discourse and cognisance of ones inescapable position in historical discourse. In short, the genealogist can never rest on his or her laurels seeming bases of truth are very constantly changing historical constructions. While Welch claims not only to possess this type of awareness, but also to recognize its absolute necessity for her theology, she is in risk of infection of defeating her own goals with no solid foundations, no fixed truths, on which to base liberation theologys arguments, how can her action-... ...78. Madness and Civilization A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Trans. Richard Howard. New York Pantheon, 1965. Kaufmann, Walter, ed. The Portable Nietzsche. New York Penguin Books, 1982. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Ann Russo, and Lourdes T orres. Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington Indiana UP, 1991. Rabinow, Paul, ed. The Foucault Reader. New York Pantheon, 1984. Schssler-Fiorenza, Elizabeth. In Memory of Her A Feminist Theological reconstructive memory of Christian Origins. New York Crossroad, 1983. Welch, Sharon D. Communities of Resistance and Solidarity A Feminist Theology of Liberation. Maryknoll, New York Orbis, 1985. A Feminist Ethic of Risk. Maryknoll, New York Orbis, 1985. Winter, Gibson. Address. Religious Social Ethics in a Postmodern World. Temple University, Philadelphia, 22 March 1995.

Epic of Beowulf Essay - Honor and Dishonor :: Epic Beowulf essays

Beowulf Balance of Values Symbolizing honor and strength, control of the wine-hall passes into the hands of the victor, under the traditional laws of the Danes and Geats. As Beowulf triumphs over the fiend, Grendel, he casts off the humiliate and enrapture which would have befallen him, and full control of the wine-hall, as well as territorial supremacy, are clearly his. Only later in the poem does Beowulf begin to have the primacy that had been exclusively his domain. Even in death, however, Beowulf is immortalized by the members of his tribe, and by the writer, as he passed into glorious history His funeral pyre, and monument on the coast, bore witness to his expectantness. It seems that the avoidance of shame and dishonor in ones youth establishes a life-long pattern in Geat Society, whether minor failures are registered later in life or not. Once a great warrior, Beowulf remains one. His people thrive on his noble character and triumphs his opponents tremble at his name, in awe and respect. Further, inter-tribal generosity and openness, for example, during scenes of thankfuness for the victory over Grendel, are overly qualities which shine forth throughout this saga, further advancing the premise that this Geat warrior-king and his people embody all of the characteristics thought noble and high-minded in the eyes of his tribesmen. The self-evident premium placed on the honor of victory, and the shame of defeat is demonstrated again and again in violent confrontations which punctuate this dramatic tale. The vote counter seems to persist in focusing on the same acts of valor, varying the descriptions only slightly, as one passage melts into the next. On many occasions, women surround the victor wine, cherish or tribute are exchanged and valiant acts are praised in song and dance. Nonetheless, destruction of ones reputation is possible, as well, as the poet points out in the sad episode dealing with Haetheyn who inadvertently killed his own kinsm an.

Cuban Missle Crisis Essay -- essays research papers

Cuban Missile Crisis Nikita Khrushchev and the Cuban Missile Crisis The Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 was the walking(prenominal) the world ever came to full-scale nuclear war. When the Soviet Union placed offensive nuclear missiles in Cuba, President Kennedy interpreted the act as superstar of hostility that would not be tolerated. However, the situation was blown way out or proportion by the president, American media, and ultimately the citizens of the United States. The Soviet Premier, Nikita Khrushchev, was reacting to the mouth of Pigs Invasion of Cuba, US Missile installations along the Turkey/Soviet border, and the clear anti-Communist policy of the United States. Khrushchev was born in Kalinovka in southwestern Russia. He was raised in a poor family whose income depended solely on the coal mining job of his father. In 1918 he joined the Bolsheviks and attended a Communist work the following year. He moved to Moscow in 1929 and began working for the Communist government. He gained much praise and advanced quickly. By 1939, he was a component of the Politburo. He became Secretary of the of the Central Committee in 1951. After Stalin died in 1953, the USSR went through two more premiers before Khrushchev came to power in 1958. As Premier, Khrushchev publically condemned the terror filled reign of Stalin. Stalin continually pushed for domination. Several Eastern European countries united with the USSR under Stalins reign and millions of innocent people were slain. Stalin also limit Soviet citizens personal liberties to previously unheard of measures. Khrushchev was a completely different ruler. He acridly criticized Stalins crimes against humanity and began a rapid process known as destalinization. This entailed destroying statues, pictures, or images of Stalin and renaming most things previously named for Stalin. Khrushchev also restored many of the personal liberties that Stalin had taken away. He let political prisoners free, restored much freedo m of thought, and restored freedom of the press. He increase production in factories and placed a strong emphasis on the Soviet space program. Although he had little pity for small, weak Europe and Asiatic countries, he worked to avoid war with Western nations. He even called for a peaceful coexistence with the United States. Khrushchev, despite being communist, was concerned for the welfare of his country and did no... ...ve the missiles if the US missiles were also removed. This created intense public opposition to the Soviet leader as he was made out to be much more militant than he actually was. He was but fighting fire with fire, but the government and media prevented the public from having the truth. It looks almost like a blatant attempt to manipulate the American public by over-dramatizing a situation for which US government was predominately responsible. Kennedy threatened invasion and he would have had support of the entire nation if he had proceeded with this plan. Khr ushchev patently didnt want war as he eventually breakd to remove the missiles and allow the US to have a nuclear advantage. Why would Khrushchev agree to remove the missiles without any US promise to remove their missiles or not to invade Cuba? The answer is obvious. Khrushchev did not want war with the United States. He was a vast improvement over Stalin as a Premier and had restored much freedom to his country. He wasnt a mad killer like Stalin and simply wanted to protect the citizens of his country, unlike Stalin had. The US government, however, wanted the media and public to think otherwise. They succeeded.

Cuban Missle Crisis Essay -- essays research papers

Cuban Missile Crisis Nikita Khrushchev and the Cuban Missile Crisis The Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 was the closest the world ever came to full-scale atomic war. When the Soviet Union placed offensive nuclear missiles in Cuba, President Kennedy interpreted the act as one of hostility that would not be tolerated. However, the billet was blown way out or proportion by the president, American media, and ultimately the citizens of the United States. The Soviet Premier, Nikita Khrushchev, was reacting to the Bay of Pigs Invasion of Cuba, US Missile installations on the Turkey/Soviet border, and the clear anti-Communist policy of the United States. Khrushchev was born in Kalinovka in southwestern Russia. He was raised in a poor family whose income depended unaccompanied on the coal mining job of his father. In 1918 he joined the Bolsheviks and attended a Communist school the following year. He moved to capital of the Russian Federation in 1929 and began working for the Communist gove rnment. He gained much praise and advanced quickly. By 1939, he was a member of the Politburo. He became Secretary of the of the Central direction in 1951. After Stalin died in 1953, the USSR went through two more premiers before Khrushchev came to power in 1958. As Premier, Khrushchev publicly condemned the terror filled reign of Stalin. Stalin continually pushed for domination. Several Eastern European countries united with the USSR under Stalins reign and millions of innocent people were slain. Stalin withal restricted Soviet citizens personal liberties to previously unhearable of measures. Khrushchev was a completely different ruler. He acridly criticized Stalins crimes against humanity and began a rapid process known as destalinization. This entailed destroying statues, pictures, or images of Stalin and renaming most things previously named for Stalin. Khrushchev also restored many of the personal liberties that Stalin had taken away. He let political prisoners free, restore d much freedom of thought, and restored freedom of the press. He increased production in factories and placed a strong emphasis on the Soviet space program. Although he had little pity for small, weak Europe and Asian countries, he worked to avoid war with western nations. He even called for a peaceful coexistence with the United States. Khrushchev, despite being communist, was concerned for the welfare of his country and did no... ...ve the missiles if the US missiles were also removed. This created intense public opponent to the Soviet leader as he was made out to be much more militant than he actually was. He was simply struggle fire with fire, but the government and media prevented the public from having the truth. It looks almost like a blatant attempt to manipulate the American public by over-dramatizing a incident for which US government was predominately responsible. Kennedy threatened invasion and he would have had support of the entire nation if he had proceeded with this plan. Khrushchev obviously didnt want war as he eventually agreed to remove the missiles and allow the US to have a nuclear advantage. Why would Khrushchev agree to remove the missiles without any US cry to remove their missiles or not to invade Cuba? The answer is obvious. Khrushchev did not want war with the United States. He was a vast improvement over Stalin as a Premier and had restored much freedom to his country. He wasnt a mad killer like Stalin and simply wanted to protect the citizens of his country, unlike Stalin had. The US government, however, wanted the media and public to think otherwise. They succeeded.